Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwan Ho Kwak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kwan Ho Kwak[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kwan Ho Kwak does not meet WP:MMABIO criteria, as he only has 2 fights in a top tier promotion out of the required 3. He also fails WP:GNG, as his fight coverage is through routine sporting report. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 04:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't meet any WP notability criteria. He doesn't have 3 top tier fights, his highest Fightmatrix ranking ever was 62nd, and all of the coverage can be classified as routine sports reporting. Papaursa (talk) 15:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NMMA for not having 3 fights under top tier promotion and unlikely the subject could meet the requirement anytime soon as the subject has not been fighting since 2017. The subject also fails GNG requirements for records are merely sport routine reports. Cassiopeia talk 00:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.