Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvitnu Fest
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No Consensus Cheers. I'mperator 13:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kvitnu Fest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Minor festival, no real claim of notability, no reliable sources cited, part of a walled garden of articles relating to the record label. J Milburn (talk) 11:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 04:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note – This user has been blocked for sock puppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs. List of Confirmed sock puppets of User:JamesBurns Untick (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, needs reliable resources for notability. Drawn Some (talk) 23:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Appears to be covered in reliable sources ([1]), but they are in Ukrainian. There is probably more in Ukrainian papers not listed on Google News. --Apoc2400 (talk) 10:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment' Are you sure that the link provided actually shows reliable sources and that they actually refer this event in the detail needed to count towards notabilty? Becuase not everything on Google news will satisfy these criteria and it looks like the only way to chack would be to read Ukrainian. Spiesr (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No I am not sure, but I think it is more likely than not. Are you sure they are not reliable and relevant? --Apoc2400 (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment' Are you sure that the link provided actually shows reliable sources and that they actually refer this event in the detail needed to count towards notabilty? Becuase not everything on Google news will satisfy these criteria and it looks like the only way to chack would be to read Ukrainian. Spiesr (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.