Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvindemuseet i Danmark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 10:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kvindemuseet i Danmark[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. could find very little coverage [1]. also Danish WP article is also unreferenced. LibStar (talk) 06:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The museum has an entry in Den Store Danske, which suggests it is a notable institution. It is possible to find out more in newspapers such as [2] (Svenska Dagbladet), [3] (Kristeligt Dagblad), [4] (Berlingske Tidende) etc (try to search for Kvindemuseet Aarhus). --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, sufficient secondary source coverage per good analysis by Vejvančický (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 19:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vejvančický. I also found a report from TV 2 News from 2011 which focused on the museum's economic struggle which was then debated in the Danish Parliament. with one parliamentarian calling the museum a leading museum of its kind in the world. (a later report from 2012, behind paywall, shows that they got more money). And here is another report from 2011 in Information about an exhibiition about rape held at the museum. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 20:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per abundance of demonstrated sources by above editors. I added some to article including 20 Good Years For Women's Museum from Jyllands-Posten and this article in the Journal of Women's History. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 20:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.