Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kutar
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Kutar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reads like advert, nothing that justifies notability. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - TheMagnificentist 11:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 12:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 12:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 12:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 12:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. I tried a news search, see just some press releases. Seems not notable. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No 3rd party or secondary sourcing, no sign of independent notability. --Killer Moff (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.