Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuchinotsu No. 37

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kuchinotsu No. 37[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I made this article in January of 2021 when I knew less about editing Wikipedia. The only reliable sources I can find about this cultivar are mentions in articles about other cultivars. It was tagged for notability in September this year. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 00:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I think you can just speedy delete it under WP:G7. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 00:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Biology, and Japan. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 00:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Deltaspace42: I am unsure if it is notable or not. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 01:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 'Encore' mandarin: if you're not sure about notability, let's just redirect the page to the more notable of its parents, where it is already mentioned. This can always be undone by any editor, if notability becomes clearer. Owen× ☎ 13:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think there's notability here. I did a Google Scholar search and turned up quite a few mentions. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] among others. Unfortunately, I don't have access to these articles. My Japanese isn't quite good enough for academic uses, but searching for "津之望つののぞみ" brings up numerous articles. DCsansei (talk) 14:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DCsansei, Are you sure that 'Tsunonozomi' is the same as Kuchinotsu No.37? I may withdraw this AfD nomination. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I believe sufficient sources have been found to prove this cultivar's notability. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.