Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ku Swee Yong

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:44, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ku Swee Yong[edit]

Ku Swee Yong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Many of the refs are articles that he has written. Several others are quotes from him - possibly press releases? Nothing here that is independent and reliable about him. This reads much more like an advertisment for his books. Apparently he was part of a team that sysnthesised a novel rutheium pyridine complex but that just helps get a Ph.D , not notability, even if it is the same person. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   08:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He has been cited by several others [1][2]. Perhaps this might shed some light on his notability within Singapore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xhitmanx1 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.storm.sg/property-market-investment-ku-swee-yong/
  2. ^ http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/hdb-supply-too-cool-too-hot-or-just-right
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:14, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This subject and article clearly seems to be promotional , since ku doesn’t seem to have enough reliable source to be eligible to get verified. This article clearly meets the deletion criteria.HeyLetgoletgo (talk) 05:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Non notable as either a "property analyst" or a "media personality". Bio spam on a nn individual; likely a COI-produced piece. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ku_Swee_Yong&oldid=1137976620"