Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kryzpo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kryzpo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aware I may be missing something in translation, but I could not establish that this company meets WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 01:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The WP:PROD in 2006 was removed but without any evidence of notability being added. Searches find some passing mentions regarding the market ambitions of Grupo Nutresa but nothing to provide verification for the article text or to establish that the product is notable. AllyD (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Dorama285 (talk) 20:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.