Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krystal Steal (3rd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Krystal Steal[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Krystal Steal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails PORNBIO and the GNG. All AVN noms are scene-related and therefore, per PORNBIO, do not contribute to notability, NightMoves award is not notable and by well-established consensus does not contribute to notability. All other content is either unsourced or promotionally sourced. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. czar · · 15:01, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 15:56, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Yet another in a seemingly endless series of vapid and undersourced biographies of porn actors. Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 16:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails GNG. She gets more GNews hits than the average porn star, but only significant coverage appears to come from Adult Video News. Even that coverage is focused on contract signings. Fails PORNBIO. The Nightmoves award is minor. Even with the "Best Tease Performance" AVN nom counted as individual, that single nomination is not enough. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:PORNBIO's clause on scene related award nominations --wL<speak·check> 09:02, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.