Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krystal Duhaney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Even though nom was blocked as a sockpuppet, several other editors in good standing !voted "delete". Randykitty (talk) 16:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Krystal Duhaney[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~A promotional and ad like article about a non notable person who fails WP:GNG speedy removed by anon IP 2Joules (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)~~[reply]

Delete Purely promotional article, all of the sources appear to be PR style blogs, non-independent. CataracticPlanets (talk) 02:44, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral on this article but note that nominator is a sockpuppet of blocked editor who now also has an indef block. HouseOfChange (talk) 20:34, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:11, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional & does't fulfil WP:GNG criteria Act345 (talk) 15:17, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.