Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krypton (programming language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to KL-ONE. – bradv^🍁 02:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Krypton (programming language)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable programming language. All primary search results return either a variation of this page or pages that originated from this. Article has not grown in the near 20 years since it was created. I can't find anything that would determine notability. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into KL-ONE. Krypton is a derivative of KL-ONE (reading the linked reference) so a brief mention there would preserve the knowledge. rsjaffe talk 22:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rsjaffe: I am uncertain if it is a derivative or simply a language that used principles from KL-ONE. The ref part you may be referring to says "KRYPTON developed mainly out of work on KL-ONE"; assuming it's an actual derivative, whilst not wholly unlikely, isn't necessarily obvious. The prose of this article is 1 sentence just stating that it is/was a language, so I am unsure what knowledge is preserved. If I thought a merge would benefit, I'd have done that instead of an AfD. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rereading the article, it looks like the Tbox is a KL-One derivative but the Abox is not. However, the article is not at all clear about the relationships, so I kind of agree with you. I'm going to alter my recommendation to merge with Ontology language where it would fit in the list in Ontology_language#Traditional_syntax_ontology_languages. rsjaffe talk 18:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into KL-ONE as suggested above.--Bduke (talk) 00:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Sufficient knowledge exists to be included in wikipedia, but they are not significant enough to warrant a standalone article. BilledMammal (talk) 05:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, but change target from my original suggestion. After looking at documentation again, its relationship with KL-ONE is less certain, but it certainly is an Ontology language and would suitably be an entry in the list Ontology_language#Traditional_syntax_ontology_languages with the reference as a footnote. So merge into Ontology language. rsjaffe talk 18:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with KL-ONE. Per page 17 of this journal work, page 2 of this journal article and page 7 of this one, Krypton is a hybrid successor of KL-ONE with an Abox and Tbox component. Heartmusic678 (talk) 16:19, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, topic is best covered within KL-ONE. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.