Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kriwi (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. ✗plicit 03:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kriwi (band)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable band. I removed the bands email address from the main text, and couldn't find any reliable sources about them. The one source that exists in the article is to a small defunct fan zine without an editorial board Very Average Editor (talk) 05:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Belarus. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaning keep on this. There are a lot of foreign-language Google hits that appear to demonstrate sigcov, eg. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. I can't confidently assess the reliability of these sources, but I think the band is likely to be notable. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 07:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if this is important, but in 1999 they were recognized as the best rock band in Belarus.--Берберов Иван (talk) 10:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That award doesn't seem significant enough in itself to grant automatic assumed notability, but if you can find reliable sources reporting on Kriwi's win, that could help. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 15:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Analysis of the proposed sources would be very helpful in determining how to proceed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.