Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristine Larsen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kristine Larsen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Academic that does not meet WP:PROF -- certainly not via research, and I don't see sufficient coverage to meet other standards Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, but consider mailing a copy to anybody who wants, for possible transfer to the Harry Potter wiki. Anybody who writes an article like "Harry Potter and the Upcoming Venus-Jupiter Conjunction" should probably be documented somewhere, but not necessarily here. Ray^Talk 14:42, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I had nominated for PROD. Checking criteria 1 through 9 at WP:PROF, I can't find any academic awards or honors, not an elected member of one of the prestigous scholarly associations, not a chair or distinguished professor, no indication of extraordinary impact within the discipline, not an editor, can't find notable impact ourside academia, and not noted for non-academic achievements. Wikipedia is not supposed to be a directory of staff members at various institutions. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:33, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails PROF. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable. Perhaps good content for a résumé or a CCSU bio, but not worthy of Wikipedia inclusion. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 12:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. The multiple local newspaper stories announcing astronomy events that involve her don't convince me of a pass of WP:GNG, either.—David Eppstein (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet criteria for WP:PROF, really no signifigant contributions or notworthy positions in associations, or institutions. Also, I agree that Wikipedia is not a directory. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 05:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.