Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristina Hänel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawing the nomination in the light of the below !votes. Randykitty (talk) 13:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kristina Hänel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person known for one event only. The event may be notable (I have no opinion about that), but the person is not per WP:BLP1E. Randykitty (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 12:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, received multiple awards for her work. The "one event" mentioned in the nomination refers to ten years of lawsuits that made her one of the most prominent people in the current German abortion debate (this is covered better in the German article than in the English one at the moment). —Kusma (t·c) 13:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The German article shows that she received ongoing coverage for over a decade. I'm not sure if BIO1E was intended for something like a long court case, which by its nature involves multiple sub events. I note that point 3 of BIO1E states that an article should only be deleted if the "individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented". Sources on the dewiki article show that her role was substantial and well documented. b uidhe 13:19, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - awards and substantial ongoing coverage indicate against this being a classic WP:BLP1E case, in my view. Hug^syrup 13:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.