Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristin Patrick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Since it already exists in draft, it can be worked on there and submitted through AfC if the creator wants to see it returned to mainspace in a less aggressively promotional state. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kristin Patrick[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a marketing executive that fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Article was also created in draft, reviewed as non-notable but creator decided to take it to mainspace. Possible WP:PROMO. Lord Grandwell (talk) 11:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lord Grandwell (talk) 11:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lord Grandwell (talk) 11:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lord Grandwell (talk) 11:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable marketing executive.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sources include Brand Innovators, Ad Week, Ad Age, Social Media Week, Campaign Live, Paley Center, and Business Insider. Subject has been one of the top female marketing executives across numerous high-profile brands and many of the sources are directly about the subject at hand.Jakeswish (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm actively adding more references to the page that showcase why Kristin Patrick is a top marketing executive and these sources include feature articles, interviews, and specific focus on her role as a marketing executive at numerous notable corporate brands.Jakeswish (talk) 21:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jakeswish: While the subject may be objectively notable, the article's corporate jargon-heavy prose and fluffy references aren't helping the cause. Association with the biggest names in industry, marketing, etc. does not establish wiki notability. Lists of top 40 movers and shakers don't do either. Objective, not-trivial coverage of this person and her accomplishments by reliable secondary sources would help. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The author has not yet answered whether they are being paid by Kristin Patrick or by her employer, Eros Innovations, or whether they have any other conflict of interest. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete as not satisfying general notability, pending possible disclosure by the author. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per the draftify guidelines, as the creator has just admitted that they have a COI. Possibly (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify per draftify guidelines.Globaleditor23 (talk) 00:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Draft article already exists at Draft:Kristin Patrick and it predates this page by the same creator. The fate of the draft awaits what happens here. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - User:Gene93k states correctly that: "The fate of the draft awaits what happens here."
- - Drafts can be speedily deleted as G11, G3, or otherwise. The draft does not need speedy deletion.
  - Drafts can be deleted at MFD. The draft has not been nominated for deletion.
  - If a title is salted in article space, a draft becomes stillborn. There is no need to salt this title, only to delete the article.
  - The draft should be left alone, and may expire, unless the subject becomes newly notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - promotional article about a non-notable marketing executive. MER-C 14:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.