Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristin George

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 05:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kristin George

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Best sourcing I can find is here [1] a WP:ROUTINE " local person wins award" story in her hometown paper. She is a pharma rep and occasional model. Fails WP:NMODEL and WP:BLP1E etc. No more notable then the winners of these events [2] Legacypac (talk) 14:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Previous incarnation of article with badly pointed references, plus polluted with unsourced garbage, so the deletion nomination is perfectly reasonable, but hopefully these problems have been fixed as per WP:HEYMANN. An article here, another article here, photo in Baltimore Sun, another article here (which doesn't mention pageants but is consistent with data from other articles). The town of Casper, Wyoming is a mid-sized city of 50,000 people, and KG gets coverage there, not just for the pageant, but as a dance coach who, unfortunately, still blushes when complimented. Multiple independent reliable sources suggests she meets the general notability guideline, but the article should remain short and avoid insertion of junk like her hobbies or high school grades.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep, mainly because Tomwsulcer has cleaned it up enough that it's just about tolerable. Plus, there is precedent for articles on Miss USA delegates - there are articles for most of the delegates between 2001 and 2012, though a random check through these brought up quite a few virtually unreferenced BLPS and unsourced garbage about how Binkie Booboo wants world peace and Mary-Sue-Jane Doe likes basketball and kittens.... Mabalu (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a WP:GNG pass per the research work done by Tomwsulcer. Ejgreen77 (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep New re-write and clean-up by Tomwsulcer makes article more appropriate. As per Ejgreen77 article passes WP:GNG WordSeventeen (talk) 02:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.