Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishnajeev TR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under criterion G5. —C.Fred (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Krishnajeev TR[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A tik tok celebrity who fails GNG Alphaonekannan (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Alphaonekannan (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom, the article fails GNG and contains excessive citations. Also the article not correctly structured, believe that it needs more contents. I also suggest the author to improve the article during this nomination if you can, otherwise I am voting the article to delete. Also somebody fix the AfD template on the article. Onmyway22 (talk) 07:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The professional-looking portrait of the article subject was taken by the editor that created the article. They claim they are just a fan who asked them for a picture, but there is a potential COI here. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note that User:0"cleopatra"0 has moved the article to the draft namespace. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it back to main space and added back the AfD tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE: Doesn't meet WP:GNG, also fails WP:NACTOR.Advait (talk) 08:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The only ACCEPT comment just below is added by 0"cleopatra"0 who is the author of article Onmyway22 (talk) 13:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since said user has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry, I have removed their comment. —C.Fred (talk) 18:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Based on that information, I think that the article can be deleted under WP:G5. On a related note, I have tagged the photograph in the infobox as a copyright violation on Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG, obvious WP:COI, etc. Lavalizard101 (talk) 16:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.