Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Kidd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kris Kidd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person is iffy. Most of the sources are not independent but I can't tell if this source and this source is enough for GNG or other criteria. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - My feeling is this is Too Soon. I think he's probably going places but all I can find are a couple of articles he wrote for Papermag and his e-book on Google Books. It was created by a single-purpose editor who has made no other edits outside the page; and the other significant contributor has also only made one edit outside the page, and that to link to Kidd from Huntington Beach High School (their edit was later removed.) If he does receive more coverage in future, that will be the right time for him to have an article created, but for now it has to be delete from me unless compelling coverage is produced. The two sources Ricky provide do include some editorial commentary on the subject other than the interview, so it is all borderline. Mabalu (talk) 18:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as my searches found nothing with mine only finding the same results at Books and browser. SwisterTwister talk 06:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very weak sourcing, all from blogs or blog-like "indie" sites. Most of what is stated here toward notability is that he has a blog, has some self-published prose, and has created Youtube videos. The information about his modeling career is un-referenced. Some of the content is quite promotional. LaMona (talk) 15:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.