Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Leverkusen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW joe decker ^talk 16:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kreuz Leverkusen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable interchange. Just like tens of thousands around the world. Was part of a massive AfD, which was closed as no consensus, since it contained interchanges which might be notable. This one isn't. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—still not notable. Imzadi 1979 → 13:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I do not see anything that indicates this is a notable interchange. -- GB fan 14:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:GNG. sst✈^(discuss) 15:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 15:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 15:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing indicates notability of this junction. MilborneOne (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - And yet another of these... I wonder if people write these indiscriminate road articles because our guidelines on these are so bad. WP:STREETS has failed like the software notability guideline. These two types of articles are among the worst kinds of good faith articles which tend to bloat the AfD. Ceosad (talk) 17:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. Directly (and poorly) translated from the German article, which provides no other insight. "Pepper" @ 17:36, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unremarkable cloverleaf interchange. Dough4872 14:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (vent) 16:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.