Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Alzey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 22:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kreuz Alzey[edit]

Kreuz Alzey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable interchange. Just like tens of thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 12:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete—having a name in a country where every interchange is named does not confer notability. This article fails WP:GNG and should be deleted. Imzadi 1979  13:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails GNG. Nothing that can't be included in a standard exit list article, if even one of those would stand up on it's own. Transparency note: Copy and pasting this comment across 4 similar AFD's as they all fail for exactly the same reason, can't be arsed to re-word for the same thing! Jeni (talk) 17:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.