Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kresh Novakovic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per this discussion, NACTOR is not met in that the topic has not had multiple significant roles in notable films, in that none of the films mentioned have articles or have otherwise been shown to be notable. GNG has not been shown to be met, and no other argument has been put forth to demonstrate notability. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kresh Novakovic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as insufficiently notable actor. Sole source is IMDb, which is not a RS by itself alone. He has a Facebook page, but that also is not a reliable source. [email protected] 06:23, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Other references appear to confirm notability. This review of Leaves of the Tree confirms the actor's role in that film. This review confirms his role in Mikeyboy. This article about the Gasparilla Film Festival confirms his roles in both “The Fix” and “Leaves of the Tree”. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- @Eastmain: the above said ref's are not good source to have an article, what i feel is the article doesn't meet notable guidelines.Vijesh sreenivasan (talk) 09:32, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 00:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The above references don't really have significant coverage, and I can't find any that do. For a source to confirm notability, it has to have discussion of the subject besides just mentioning their existence, or saying that they had such and such role. Gilded Snail (talk) 04:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.