Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of D.N.Angel characters. MBisanz ^talk 02:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Krad

Delete. Fails the general notability guideline for fiction, lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party sources and all that. JBsupreme (talk) 08:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to List of D.N.Angel characters. Without any references or indication that this can referenced to actual available non-pirated episodes a lot of the in-universe content is unverifiable (contrary to what some believe, I think a certain level of in-universe content is crucial to describe fictional characters). However, the lead section and the first part of the section after that is likely sourceable and could be placed in the character list. At the very least, the redirect is warranted to point readers to actual coverage of the character if this particular bit of material is deemed deletable. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:53, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the list like its already slated to be. Didn't we just deal with this with TTN?? Merging has already been discussed and approved and is in progress. This AfD is nothing but a complete waste of time. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, a whack with a trout to the nominator for nominating for deletion an article (one of several) that a consensus agreement on the main article's talk page should be merged, and history logs show that other articles were being so merged. Trampling on other editors' toes = not good faith. Second, reaffirm that consensus to merge to List of D.N.Angel characters -- and let the editors involved do so at their own time, instead a rushed merge by the closing admin. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Obvious Merge~~ Speedy close The article is already slated for merger into the character list and the nominator did not give a reason as to why this merger should not be carried out. We've already been though very similar AfDs about characters within the same fictional series and the merge consensus formed at Talk:List of D.N.Angel characters has yet to be overruled. --Farix (Talk) 15:27, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per consensus before abd after this nomination. Edward321 (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.