Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koyla (restaurant)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 05:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Koyla (restaurant)

Hi - non-notable, unsourced topic. Rama's Arrow 21:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rama's Arrow 21:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain -- AFAIK, the restaurant has been razed by the BMC as it was an illegal. =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:17, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very weak keep per above. --Gurubrahma 10:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - It has been razed down. I have added a reference and some more text. I think it can stay. Ganeshk (talk) 07:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I guess, only because it was knocked down because it was illegal. -- mm e inhart 03:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Hmm. I guess I'm having difficulty seeing why this should be retained, guys. It is (/was) a run-of-the-mill restaurant that was closed down... why (and how) would we write an encyclopedia article about it? Of what significance is this establishment to history, to the world, or even to the country or state (or even city) in which it once existed? WP:ISNOT a random collection of trivia or a database of news cuttings. It is (or aims to be) an encyclopedia, with well-researched articles on well-studied/reported items. I'm leaning delete, but will be glad to revise my opinion if I'm missing something here. Very kind regards —Encephalon 02:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete tons of buildings are demolished because they violate various laws. Many are condemned, for example. That does not make them notable. If an article about its owner (who appears notable for being a member of parliament) ever gets written, it might deserve a mention in that article, but a redirect would be out of order, being as it is a very unlikely search term. Not notable enough for a dab at Koyla either. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 01:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.