Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koyal Rana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Koyal Rana[edit]

Koyal Rana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NMODEL, notable only for a single event. Article is full of fancruft. - Managerarc talk 22:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Rebbing 23:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG - unclear that India Times is actually RS BlueSalix (talk) 01:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable breauty pageant winner.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: This one is a national winner of a feeder pageant to Miss World, which is one of the 2-3 most notable international pageants. Plus she's done stuff since. Article needs work, but I think she passes. Montanabw(talk) 07:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • If found to not be independently notable, redirect to Femina Miss India 2014 as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there as winner of the pageant. North America1000 16:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 15:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.