Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korg i3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is no consensus for deletion here (and a source has been found for some verification meaning there are no overriding policy grounds for deletion. Davewild (talk) 08:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Korg i3

Notability concerns lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak to moderate keep. I'd be very surprised if they weren't easy to find, though probably more likely in hard copy than online. Still, a quick google search turned up such items as this and this. Grutness...wha? 01:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Grutness, stating the obvious, those links prove existence, but don't represent significant coverage in reliable sources. PhilKnight (talk) 01:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Phil - true enough, though as I said, there should be quite a number of hard copy items about this synth. The i1-i4 series were popular synths back in their day. You're right about the two links I added, but they were mainly to show that such synths are at least still being talked about, despite being in that area which is "old technology" but not yet "classic". Grutness...wha? 02:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per fist sentence of WP:V The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia already has been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true, unless references provided,per WP:PROVEIT, this article is in Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2006, there are no articles on Wikipedia that have been tagged for lack of references longer then this article. Jeepday (talk) 09:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Maybe it isn't the Korg Triton, but it's notable. Music magazines from the early 90s probably don't have their archives online, but there's enough in Google News to verify the main points, with one source calling it, along with the i2, Korg's "most advanced instruments to date". Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.