Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koreans in Pakistan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:23, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Koreans in Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No journalists or scholars have written non-trivially about this group, so it is impossible to write an encyclopedia article about them. Tagged for {{notability}} since December 2009. The fact that Pakistan has ~500 Korean expatriates living there is already noted at Korean diaspora, and there's no other sourced content to merge.
Google searches in both English (e.g. korean * karachi, and Korean (e.g. Pakistan Koreans, Pakistan compatriots, etc.) fail to bring up any useful results.
Keywords searches restricted to specific newspapers don't bring any useful results either (e.g. searching for "Koreans" on Dawn [1], or "Pakistan" [2] on Overseas Korean Newspaper). cab (talk) 08:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 08:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 08:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 08:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is nothing more than an article built around a couple of statistics (i.e., there are either 529 or 445 Koreans among the 169,000,000 residents of Pakistan). Mandsford (talk) 14:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I created this article but did not able to find out sources to expand it further. --Saki talk 05:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment In that there have been no other edits except by the article creator, who requests deletion, this now qualifies as a WP:SPEEDY under G7. Mandsford (talk) 12:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.