Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koray Erdoğan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Koray Erdoğan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just...spam...and mostly unsourced. Likely socking between Mutlutopuz and Happybloom. Since most of the sources are not English, hard to tell if some article couldn't possibly be created. But given the obvious glamour shots, if this ain't UPE then I'm a monkey's uncle, even if it's not socking. Everything I'm seeing in English seems to be below low quality unusable sources. GMG ^talk 16:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:29, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This is a really annoying article. Its counterparts in French and German have been deleted, and the Turkish version has a tag on it.\. I'm reluctant to delete the article, though, because he and his inventions may represent something notable. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-9250 and https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=PJz5GDoAAAAJ indicate that he has published in what I think are peer-reviewed journals, although the publications haven't been cited much. here is coverage in the Independent, a reliable British newspaper. Turkish-language newspaper articles can be translated using Google Translate. He likes to throw parties to bring in business, which explains why some of the references are about his parties rather than his hair-transplantation techniques. National Geographic's video unit's coverage is an argument for notability. This is an English-language reference from what I think is an English-language broadcaster in Turkey. Maybe stub the article, get rid of the part coverage and keep the neutral medical stuff. But in light of the history of the article, I don't feel like making these repairs myself. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. At first sight this has all the signs of self-advertisement. However, the World FUE Institute does seem to exist and to have its headquarters in Belgium, with Koray Erdoğan as its President. However, I haven't managed to find a meaningful website. The link at World FUE Institute doesn't lead anywhere useful, at least that was the case until I deleted it. It talked about a meeting that "will be held in November 2016" (almost five years ago!). I suspect that the World FUE Institute article is also primarily advertising, and probably a good candidate for deletion itself. Athel cb (talk) 06:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Absolutely agree with nom. Gentleman wiki (talk) 18:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Eastmain It has been speedied on trwiki as well, just a few minutes after I tagged it for UPE.... I was getting ready to AfD it there too anyways so. Creating user (Mutlutopuz) is known to be an paid editor. Sources seem crap to me (PR pieces). Don't see how it meets NPROF. Delete. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 13:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most certainly PR work, probably paid, and not notable. Article on tr.wiki has been deleted btw. Dr. Coal^Message 13:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.