Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KoralBlue Airlines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. buidhe pointed out that there may be RS in Arabic; if any are located, I am willing to undelete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KoralBlue Airlines[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a short-lived, defunct charter airline that at one time may have operated three small aircraft on unscheduled routes. Only one reference in the article. BEFORE fails to find additional RS. Fails WP:NCORP. Chetsford (talk) 05:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep clearly operated commercial flights and clearly existed per Flight, it could do with more references but that is not a reason to delete. MilborneOne (talk) 07:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"clearly operated commercial flights and clearly existed" The mere existence of a thing is not proof of WP:N. I exist but I am not notable. Chetsford (talk) 17:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This was not an insignificant airline in Egyptian terms and the Airbus A320 is not a 'small' aircraft. This deletionist approach to airlines is not helpful. Ardfern (talk) 11:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"This was not an insignificant airline in Egyptian terms" Unfortunately, we have to judge articles based on WP's WP:N terms, not on "Egyptian terms", and "there is not a specific inclusion criterion for small airlines". This means we need WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. A one-line mention in a directory, is not SIGCOV. Chetsford (talk) 17:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As stated already there are not reliable sources on the company. Which is the only thing that matters, per WP:ATA. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:37, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, airlines are not inherently notable and this one shows no indication of passing WP:NORG. Renata (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete assuming that no RS exist, it's possible there may be some in Arabic. b uidhe 23:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.