Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korail Class 200

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Korail Class 200

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is basically machine translated nonsense, suggest WP:TNT as the only way to create a decent article would be to start from scratch Jac16888 ^Talk 16:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Sawol (talk) 11:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - There isn't one sentence in this entire article that makes any sense!, I think Blowing it up and starting over is the best thing for this mess of an article!. –Davey2010^Talk 23:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.