Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koji Doi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 15:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Koji Doi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable wrestler with no coverage in sources independent of the subject. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 10:51, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 10:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 10:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant independent coverage. Listings in an online database is not enough.Jakejr (talk) 14:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only references are to an internet wrestling database and even that lists nothing under "career highlights" except for beginning his career. Definitely fails GNG and any sports criteria. Astudent0 (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not really notable and article just lists a series of win/lose/draw in a large, unbroken paragraph. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 10:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ I have noticed that the wrong name was given in Japanese characters, so I have inserted the correct name 土肥孝司 into the article. A search of this name turns up quite a few news articles from this year alone, so there are certainly independent sources. I do not have the time to examine whether they are enough to staisfy WP:GNG or are only routine reports though. I will take a look and report back later. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are plenty of routine reports, but not much to write a biography about. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.