Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ko's Journey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ko's Journey[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet the intent of the general notability guideline. Google is filled with not much in the way of independent, secondary, reliable sources, and the WP:VG/SE returns not a whole lot: Kotaku and Killscreen. The article also appears to have been started by the person running the company making the game. Izno (talk) 01:49, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Less applicable for edutainment, but had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. Nothing more than passing mentions in Google Books. There are no worthwhile redirect targets, such as a developer article. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 23:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.