Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knuts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Keeper | 76 02:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Knuts[edit]

Unreferenced, unencyclopedic. Not of any significance. Cargoking talk 10:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Already covered in Harry Potter universe#Economy. Not significant enough for a separate article. Searching on "knut" gets you there via two disambiguation pages which could be merged. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
delete Agree, this is already covered in the main article, no need for a stub about it. Fuzbaby (talk) 14:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would consider merging, but the knut is already covered in Harry Potter universe#Economy as DanielRigal points out.--Junius49 (talk) 01:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.