Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knox Grammar School Army Cadet Unit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Knox Grammar School --JForget 02:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Knox Grammar School Army Cadet Unit

This school organization is insufficiently notable, I think, and there is already enough coverage for it in the school article itself (Knox Grammar School). Delete (do not merge, as the article's information is too much information when it comes to the school). --Nlu (talk) 03:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (talk) 05:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable as per nom. It is just like a Scout Troop and we do not have articles for them unless there is something very special about them. --Bduke (talk) 05:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable commentary which could be described for similar units at other schools. Murtoa (talk) 06:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Nick Dowling (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's a long-standing convention that individual cadet units aren't notable, and this seems to be no exception. Including some material in the article on the parent school would probably be warrented though. --Nick Dowling (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unremarkable cadet unit. A mention in the relevant school article would seem to be appropriate. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Non-notable (just another school cadet unit) and already covered sufficiently in Knox Grammar School. Loopla (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.