Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge Density

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge Density

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

To small context to have its own article. merge to knowledge graph Sulaimandaud (talk) 08:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yeah, WP:LEAD too short to be a WP:independent article, merge those information to Ontology (information science) article is the advisable way. SA 13 Bro (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete alas, another article created as the first (and so far only?) edit of a poor new user. When will we ever learn that letting new users create articles without review is not a good idea? A general concept (not proper noun) would not use capital letters anyway. W Nowicki (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.