Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Know Thyself

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Know Thyself[edit]

Know Thyself (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that it passes WP:NBOOKS. Article about the book's author is currently tagged with a BLPPROD. PROD contested by article's creator. I have given them time to add additional WP:RS to the article but it looks as if none are forthcoming. shoy (reactions) 13:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The only halfway decent source I can find is this review in Afternoon, a tabloid newspaper, and that's not even remotely enough to pass NBOOK. The only other things were a handful of WP:SPS like blogs and e-commerce sites selling the book. This is actually mildly promotional, but not so much that I'd say that it would be speedyable. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel kenneth (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Adding a more targeted source search, since the title is very common. Jclemens (talk) 21:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I am unable to find anything better than Tokyogirl79. Jclemens (talk) 21:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.