Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knight Owl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep Jclemens (talk) 04:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Knight Owl[edit]
- Knight Owl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
DELETE. Contested prod yet does not appear to uphold WP:MUSIC standards. Lacks requisite non-trivial coverage from multiple reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 06:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 10:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There is a bio and a review at Allmusic, he gets a mention in Encyclopedia of Latino Popular Culture by Cordelia Candelaria and Peter J. García (Greenwood, 2004), and this artist has released upwards of 25 albums and compilations since 1995 on labels including EMI[1] and East Side. I don't see how deleting this article is going to improve the encyclopedia.--Michig (talk) 06:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and mark for Clean-up/Expansion per Michig. Also the source cited mentions an interview. Might be worth adding? Gosox5555 (talk) 00:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.