Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klingon cuisine

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge and redirect with Klingon -- Francs2000 | Talk 16:17, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Klingon_cuisine[edit]

not notable Star Trek trivia --Dv 16:58, July 27, 2005 (UTC)

Smerge and redirect to Klingon or something. Or just delete it. Very crufty. -R. fiend 17:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Klingon - nn star trek trivia Hosterweis (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, because it is imperative that fuck you faggots.

sign your posts. Hosterweis (talk) 17:04, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to forgive him, it's Klingon nature to be abrupt.. JamesBurns 06:31, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not even worth merging if you ask me. Cruftastic. Agentsoo 17:13, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. -- user:zanimum
Mmm... Gagh. Merge into Klingon per above. — RJH 17:47, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- (Just like revenge, its a dish best served cold. AND ALIVE!!!) -- user:zanimum (sorry)
Merge as per above. Fernando Rizo T/C 19:32, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam - Thatdog 19:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Merge to Klingon. That article is already quite big and might get too big with this addition. If this is the case Strong Keep. The theme is often cited in all Start Trek and essential to a right description of the Klingon race.-Poli (talk • contribs) 20:30, 2005 July 27 (UTC)
Keep. We list tons of pop-culture crap, and though this isn't something I'm personally interested in, it isn't hard to imagine there's plenty of people who are. --Scimitar ^parley 21:48, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge. Why not? There's already plenty of Klingon junk... Mmmbeer 23:01, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
WTF is 'cruft'

Based on the following definition, I'd guess crap. Hosterweis (talk) 01:20, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

cruft: /kruhft/ [very common; back-formation from crufty] 1. n.
An unpleasant substance. The dust that gathers under your bed is
cruft; the TMRC Dictionary correctly noted that attacking it with a
broom only produces more. 2. n. The results of shoddy construction.
3. vt. [from `hand cruft', pun on `hand craft'] To write assembler
code for something normally (and better) done by a compiler (see
hand-hacking). 4. n. Excess; superfluous junk; used esp. of
redundant or superseded code. 5. [University of Wisconsin] n. Cruft
is to hackers as gaggle is to geese; that is, at UW one properly
says "a cruft of hackers".

See Wikipedia:Cruft. Defintion 4 from your quote, I think. -Splash 02:11, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia should be cleaned up. I recommend the Gay Nigger Association of America for deletion next, it's about time someone got rid of that. Pigger 01:18, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- You are kidding, right? Do that and you will get lynched by a large number of people! -Splash 02:11, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vote against deletion -- these are not fanon, or hoax, they are words with which non-Trekxperts will be unfamiliar and which they may well wish to look up, without having to endure listening to the 8-hour Trekkie version, with hand-gestures, convention reminiscences and closest-modern-day-approximations recipes.

has independant value; shopuld be in Wiki somewhere --Simon Cursitor 07:56, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am the original author of this article and have contributed some of the foods and beverages listed. I really wish to preserve the article's contents. Keep or Merge to Klingon. — JIP | Talk 09:49, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. There is enough here for an article. JamesBurns 02:29, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Strongly Merge. If the Romulans article can include Romulan cuisine, the Klingons article can include Klingon Cuisine - raktajino is something a lot of ppl might be interested in. Coronela 03:21, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.