Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klement Tinaj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Klement Tinaj[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly an autobiography. Notability dubious based on unclear references. Mondiad (talk) 13:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 November 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 14:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 14:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this current version is simply not acceptable and not to mention the subject started it himself and having this look like a personal webpage so that's certainly not helping. Pinging tagger PRehse and likely interested subject users Wikimandia and MichaelQSchmidt. SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

reluctant keep I found a very nice English-language article about this person on Albanian Daily News which was picked up by Albanian Ulqini and others , and I found a decent Albanian-language interview by Voice of America shared on Newday... and other Albanian-language coverage in such as Kosovo Sot. Essentially, being unknown here is not the factor... as notable to Albania through Albanian coverage is just fine for en.Wikipedia. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I like the Reluctant part of Reluctant Keep but will hold off voting for a bit. The article is a glaring piece of self-promotion complete with un-necessary fluff and it would be easier to see some claim to notability if it was fixed up by someone other than the original author. The Albanian Daily article reads like a promo piece and only contributes towards fulfilling WP:GNG - I would say we would need much more. His work remains minor roles and self produced work of no significance.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant keep - but cut to stub to remove promo stuff. He does have coverage and he's been in some high-profile films. I feel like he's just on the cusp of GNG and if we delete the article it will just be recreated within three months. —Мандичка^YO 😜 22:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.