Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klee Irwin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Klee Irwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No external sources are provided to indicate notability and Google News doesn't show much beyond press releases from the subject's buisness interests and a couple of random swipes at the man's appearance and demeanor. — Scientizzle 22:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No external sources simply should be listed as verification needed. If other info pitchman are included, Klee Irwin should be included as well since he is on air as much as others on Wiki. The article simply needs to be expanded and sourced.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Postcard Cathy (talk • contribs)
- It would be more helpful if independent, reliable sources were provided. Do you know of any through which we could write an appropriate BLP article that is more than one line? — Scientizzle 15:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Very week keep. Googlenews indicates some notability, [1] but it seems that he's seen in a negative light by most reliable soures, so perhaps we should err on the safe side. --PinkBull 00:54, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 05:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:N per article content, making infomercials does not make notable it makes salesmen. No WP:RS on article. Jeepday (talk) 23:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.