Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klara Buda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Klara Buda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:GNG. Search comes up with nothing but her own blog and and a Linkedin page. Will211 |Chatter 04:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - has a good French page. More sources in French than in English. Need to search in French not English. However, her work in the French wiki and on Google is still not very substantial. So delete may be necessary. If this article is kept needs to be cleaned up as translation from French is poor.EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I was able to do a little bit of cleanup and added some references. She does seem to be well covered in both French and Albanian. I would love to have someone with database access look at French or Albanian news from the time of the Kosovo war and see what we can dig up. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:23, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A more constructive use of time might involve improving the entry. A minute of googling throws up plenty of online sources. Some are more useful than others, but taken together they certainly give enough ammunition for a reasonable "start class entry".[1][2][3][4]. Ten minutes of googling looks likely to throw up more. And they're not ALL in those nasty foreign languages. Success Charles01 (talk) 06:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Charles01. For some reason, I was only getting non-English sources, and I'm not proficient (though I wish I was). I did see Pink and the Klarabudapost that you mention, but I didn't think they would help show notability. At any rate, thanks for looking. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was told by Susun - and on reflection I'm sure it's true - that google gives each of us our own tailored set of search results according to what it has decided we are likely to appreciate (or...) so I guess some cunning google algorithm has figured out that you like to look up stuff in French. Do you share a computer-id with a linguist? But I'm drifting off topic. As one does. Best Charles01 (talk) 16:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I live in a border town, Charles01, and my IP is a shared one. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Now that Megalibrarygirl and I have tidied it up and added sources, it looks as if it meets requirements.--Ipigott (talk) 07:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I feel better that Ipigott was able to take a look at my sources, since my language skills aren't up to snuff. Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficient independent sources to satisfy GNG. There is no requirement that sourcing be in English. (By the by, the google search has to do with your IP address. I get different information in my location than do people across the pond or in the US.) SusunW (talk) 19:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.