Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitchie Nadal (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kitchie Nadal (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

can't establish any notability or find significant coverage Alan - talk 01:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - For some reason, I'm still finding this redlinked on the article. It does redirect to this discussion from there, kind of a strange bug. Also, if more information can be provided as to how she became notable before becoming a solo artist, this might be helpful to a decision. CycloneGU (talk) 02:35, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to Keep, this article by the Manila Bulletin calls the album a "tremendous success", while another source claims the album "went double platinum selling more than 100,000 units". Sometimes, when I see a nominator claim they "can't establish any notability or find significant coverage", what I think they mean is they just haven't bothered to look. riffic (talk) 10:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Easy keep. The ABS-CBN reference said this album was double platinum (sold 80,000 units or more). I'm all for deleting albums no one heard about but this sold well. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 11:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A debut album that sold well by a now famous singer. Moray An Par (talk) 12:40, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Good sources. CycloneGU (talk) 13:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.