Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitchen and the Plastic Spoons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sources not found Shii (tock) 06:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kitchen and the Plastic Spoons[edit]

Kitchen and the Plastic Spoons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see them meeting any criteria of WP:BAND LibStar (talk) 13:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (chinwag) @ 21:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (jive) @ 21:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (tell) @ 14:52, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (chew) @ 20:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep - from eh sources I can find the band is notable. though not very famous, yet.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
what criteria of WP:BAND do they meet? LibStar (talk) 04:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to support notability. Also does not meet WP:BAND  B E C K Y S A Y L E 00:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm not seeing the significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject needed to meet WP:GNG. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.