Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirstyn Pearce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 18:21, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kirstyn Pearce[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about semi-professional soccer player who isn't the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Article was included in a bundled AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Logue) nine years ago, but the rationale for keeping the article was unclear (and likely a problem of dissecting the large bundle of nominated articles). There have been no substantive improvements to the article in the past 9 years and nothing available online indicates the potential that the article could pass WP:GNG - I could only find a match report that mentions her twice.Jogurney (talk) 19:43, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:46, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:46, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:46, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:47, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with OP's and Giant's reasoning. No significant coverage/ WP:IRS via ProQuest search. Cabrils (talk) 00:15, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:05, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree. No significant coverage --Dreerwin (talk) 15:11, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.