Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirk Fernandez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as the subject appears to lack significant, independent coverage in reliable sources to satisfy the site's notability requirements AustralianRupert (talk) 03:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kirk Fernandez

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessperson, no significant sources, very promotional at that. Can’t find any RS in more expansive source searches. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 01:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources provided are either not independent nor reliable in passing mentioned. A BEFORE, found no evident sources to support the notability of the subject. Fails WP:GNG. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:20, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, with additional notes. This was created by a SPA, during a period when we were expanding rapidly and not always strict about WP:GNG, but things have changed in the past 8 years. There's not a single reliable source in this BLP article, and nothing that even could be considered notable about this fairly ordinary business person. In 2020, everybody knows that we are not a free resume service. Bearian (talk) 18:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly no SIGCOV available for this non-notable individual. PK650 (talk) 22:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.