Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirby of the Stars: Second Generation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kirby of the Stars: Second Generation[edit]

This is fancruft. Google search turns up 0 results, and a video game fan fiction created by a fan on a fan forum doesn't seem to satisfy WP:CSD A7 or WP:NN to me. Also violates WP:WEASEL and WP:NPOV. I originally PRODded the article, but the IP that's been editing the article promptly removed it, so I put it up at AFD. Green451 00:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, two chapters of fan-fiction doesn't denote an article. Voice of Treason 00:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Voice of Treason. Kalani ^[talk] 00:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 00:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This fanfiction isn't notable. WhisperToMe 00:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity.--Jersey Devil 01:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete I'm against self-published fan fiction of any form on Wikipedia. Danny Lilithborne 01:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fanfics don't belong here unless they for some reason are notable. This doesn't cut it. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 01:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 01:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion, fanfiction is not encyclopedic material. --TheFarix (Talk) 02:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, NN -- Alias Flood 02:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I love playing the Kirby games, but please delete this stumbling block and move it to fanfiction.net instead. It just doesn't belong on WP. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 02:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. SynergeticMaggot 02:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. How odd that an article on fanfic regarding a videogame character would violate WP:POV, but there you go. -- H·G (^words/_works) 03:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Ace of Sevens 04:35, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 04:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obviously, we can't list every fan-fix ever written and this supplies no claim of notability. I suspect it's a vanity article, because I can't see anyone but the original of author of something fairly non-notable going being so thorough. Ace of Sevens 05:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per vanity and notability reasons above. --SevereTireDamage 06:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable (0 Google hits), probable vanity. --Evan Robidoux 07:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7-- if it can't assert it's importance than that is a second reason to delete —— Eagle (ask me for help) 20:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete... fan fiction? WP:ENC, people... --Kinu ^t/_c 04:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.