Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kira Takenouchi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaoi house, mutatis mutandis. Sandstein 19:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kira Takenouchi[edit]

Delete. Non-notable author. All references I could find appear to be self-promotion by the subject and/or her publisher. Most of the editors for this article are single-purpose-accounts, editing only this article and the publisher's article, Yaoi house‎. (BTW, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaoi house). I kissed a girl with 13 fingers (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete same reasoning as with Yaoi house, above. Non-notable, borderline attack page. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still Speedy delete. The personal attacks are attached to a blog, not to a reliable source. I removed them and tagged for speedy deletion as an attack article, which it is. Let's not let this go on too long. --Blechnic (talk) 22:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As with Yaoi house, speedy deletion is not appropriate as there are neutral versions. As with Yaoi house, Delete as lacking notability or verifiable, reliable sources. Little more than a vehicle for promotion of subject's works. Dloh cierekim 03:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A1. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 09:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the lack of context in this page? Is A1 really what you meant? This article cannot be speedy deleted Fritzpoll (talk) 10:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's even an assertion of notability. I think the focus should be on attempting to find verifiable, reliable sources that show the subject meets notability requirements. If those can be found, we can keep the article. Cheers Dloh cierekim 13:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't seem to find anything that could be called an assertion of notability. Please help me out. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 12:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Had a novel series "which gained a worldwide following," asserts notability. Top levels in a specific genré. Dloh cierekim 12:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Vandalism is gone and the article is just a stub. As it has an article in a reliable source, it is notable enough for me, but remember that WP:N is just a guideline. Give it some time to mature and then revisit in a year. --Dragon695 (talk) 21:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.