Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kipsu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kipsu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable company. Just another company doing everyday business. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Aside from routine announcements, the main reference offered is the NYT piece which describes it as "another start-up" while describing both this and another firm's applications. I added a reference to a Nov 2015 article about the company, though that is in its local press and also indicates the firm had 11 employees at that time. While it is a firm going about its business, I do not see attained notability at this point. AllyD (talk) 12:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable company....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.