Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinza browser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 05:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kinza browser[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No effort has been made to establish its notability. The only references in this article is the main website of Kinza browser itself. Due to it failing WP:GNG despite a call for secondary sources in the form of an old template, I think this article should be removed. It can always be re-added later should someone find reliable secondary sources. Megaman en m (talk) 22:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Megaman en m (talk) 22:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Megaman en m (talk) 22:36, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This article has only nine words of prose and zero independent sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article text makes no claim to notability and searches are finding sporadic listings but no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 06:58, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete,Per nom. no secondary source, no sign of notability. Alex-h (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.