Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings transport (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BJ^Talk 04:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kings transport[edit]

Back in 2005 this article was nominated for deletion by VfD and as Copyvio at the same time. Somehow it survived both when it should have been deleted as copyvio (at least). Now the company's webpage has changed but this remains. In any case, this cargo company is not notable. (About their only claim to notability is sponsoring a race car in the Australian Formula 3.) Abductive (talk) 07:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While I do find a few hits in google news archive: [1] they appear to be mostly press-releases and other information originating from the company itself, not independent sources. Seems solidly non-notable. Recommend Speedy Delete on the grounds of (1) promotional content (b) COPYVIO concerns. (iii) previous AfD. Cazort (talk) 21:20, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spammy and doesn't meet WP:ORG. Nick-D (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems like advertising, fails WP:ORG. –Moondyne 03:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.