Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings Elliot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seddon talk 00:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kings Elliot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to the only source provided "SRF 3 honors aspiring musicians from Switzerland. One act is in focus every month." She is one of a number of people to be named best talent and the description itself notes she is "aspiring" which means she doesn't meet WP:NMG yet. Notfrompedro (talk) 20:35, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Notfrompedro (talk) 20:35, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I added some additional sources. I believe this singer is notable per 'Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works'. Math1985 (talk) 14:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.
Logs: 2021-08 ✍️ create
--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TOOSOON. A voter above added several sources but I find them to be generally suspicious, using terms like "classic" for a song that was just released or "rising" which is a typical term used by an artist's promoters rather than journalists. Those sources are overwhelmingly promotional and only show that she has a management team that knows how to get PR releases onto fancy looking websites. That does not equate to the significant and reliable coverage from impartial journalists that is necessary here. If her songs hit the charts that may change. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:53, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 18:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.