Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KingdomOfKnights
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 05:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- KingdomOfKnights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable unreleased video game. No significant coverage by reliable independent sources to pass the WP:GNG. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:54, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 22:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 04:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not even released yet, and doesn't look like it will be especially notable when it is. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 08:22, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Unreleased video game with no good coverage. SL93 (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.